wellrank.ai
Sign In
First Derm logo

First Derm

First cited by AI Jun 11, 2026
firstderm.com

Surfaced organically in AI answers about online dermatology. Not yet profiled.

AI Visibility

Visibility trend

Online dermatology, daily share of AI answers mentioning First Derm, through Jul 26, 2026.

6.7%

Avg position when mentioned: 3.3 · peak 21% on Jun 12

By engine

Where First Derm is strong, and where it is invisible.

  • ChatGPT
    20.0%
  • Claude
    6.7%

Mention sentiment

Tone of AI mentions across all tracked answers.

  • 50 positive mentions
  • 6 neutral
  • 0 mixed or cautious

Recent AI answers mentioning First Derm

ChatGPTJul 25, 2026, 12:37 UTC
Online dermatology vs an in person dermatologist: when is online enough?

Short answer: online dermatology is usually enough for common, non‑urgent issues (acne, simple rashes, eczema, rosacea, hair loss triage, prescription refills and follow‑ups). See an in‑person dermatologist when a lesion might be cancerous, you need a biopsy or procedure, you have severe/widespread or painful symptoms, or you need treatments that require office visits and monitoring. When online dermatology is a reasonable choice Mild–moderate acne, rosacea, or eczema that’s not getting worse Simple medication adjustments or routine refills and follow‑ups Hair loss evaluations or initial triage for scalp problems Quick second opinions based on photos (non‑urgent) Convenience: faster access, lower cost, easy follow‑up messaging When you should see someone in person Any changing, irregular, dark, bleeding, or new pigmented mole (possible skin cancer) Lesions that are growing rapidly, painful, ulcerated or bleeding Widespread, blistering, or systemic rashes (fever, feeling unwell) Need for biopsy, excision, Mohs surgery, cryotherapy, phototherapy, or in‑office cosmetic procedures (injectables, lasers) Complex chronic conditions needing lab monitoring or biologic therapy (some aspects can be started/monitored remotely, but many require in‑person workups) Pediatric patients with concerning lesions or infants with severe rashes Red flags — get urgent in‑person care or ER if you have: Rapidly spreading rash with fever or difficulty breathing Deep, painful skin infection (red, swollen, hot, with fever) Bleeding, rapidly growing or ulcerated skin lesion How to decide Use telederm for first triage when you doubt severity or want a quick prescription/follow‑up. If the clinician recommends in‑person evaluation, do it. Take good photos (well lit, multiple angles, include ruler or coin for scale, show surrounding skin and location). Specific telederm services (examples) Curology — personalized topical prescriptions and ongoing messaging; good for acne and skin‑care management. Apostrophe — dermatologist‑directed plans for acne, rosacea, and general skin problems; convenient for prescriptions and follow‑ups. First Derm — fast image‑based consultations and triage for a quick second opinion. Teladoc / Amwell / MDLIVE — established telemedicine platforms that offer dermatology visits, often covered by some insurers. SkinVision (app) — AI mole risk screening for quick checks (useful as a triage tool only; not a substitute for a dermatologist). If you need an in‑person dermatologist Look for a board‑certified dermatologist (check American Academy of Dermatology or your country’s equivalent). For suspected skin cancer seek a clinic that does biopsy/Mohs surgery; for complex inflammatory disease or cosmetic procedures seek a specialist with relevant experience. What to prepare for any visit (tele or in‑person) Clear photos, a timeline of the problem, current medications, allergies, prior treatments and their results, and any relevant medical history. If you tell me the problem you have (example: “new mole,” “acne not responding to OTC,” “widespread itchy rash”), I can say whether a telederm is sufficient and recommend the best next step and one or two services to try.

Mentioned in position 3 of 7

Read full answer with sources →
ChatGPTJul 24, 2026, 09:39 UTC
Can an online dermatologist reliably diagnose a mole or rash from photos?

Short answer: Yes — for many rashes and some benign-appearing moles, a board‑certified dermatologist can often make a reliable diagnosis from good photos. But there are important limits: image quality, lesion type, and the inability to examine with dermoscopy or do a biopsy mean telederm is less reliable for suspicious pigmented lesions (possible melanoma) and some atypical conditions. What telederm does well Common rashes (eczema, contact dermatitis, psoriasis, fungal infections, drug rashes) and straightforward acne or hair/scalp problems are often diagnosed accurately from photos and history. Providers can give treatment recommendations, prescriptions, and follow-up plans remotely. Main limitations Pigmented lesions/moles: dermoscopy (magnified polarized light exam) and biopsy are often needed to confidently rule out melanoma. Telederm can flag lesions that need in‑person evaluation but should not be the only test for a suspicious mole. Image quality, lighting, lack of tactile information (texture, induration), and no opportunity for biopsy reduce diagnostic certainty. Some conditions mimic each other visually; misdiagnosis risk is higher for rare or atypical presentations. When to seek in‑person/urgent care Any mole with ABCDE changes (Asymmetry, Border irregularity, Color variation, Diameter >6 mm or enlargement, Evolving). New, rapidly growing, painful, bleeding, crusting, or nonhealing lesions. Rash with systemic symptoms (fever, difficulty breathing, dizziness), widespread blistering, or large areas of skin shedding. How to make a telederm visit as reliable as possible Photos: take multiple high‑resolution images — one from a distance to show location, one close‑up, and one with scale (coin or ruler). Use natural light, avoid flash glare, keep camera steady, and include surrounding skin. For moles, also provide a close dermoscopic photo if you have access to a dermatoscope attachment. Provide history: onset, evolution, symptoms (itch, pain, bleeding), prior treatments and responses, personal/family skin cancer history, immune status, recent sun exposure, and relevant meds. Ask whether the telederm is board‑certified and whether the platform allows follow‑up or referral for biopsy if needed. Confirm HIPAA/privacy protections if concerned. Reputable telederm options (examples) Teladoc Dermatology — large telemedicine provider that connects you with board‑certified dermatologists; works with many insurers and offers scheduled e‑visits. Amwell Dermatology — similar model to Teladoc, with dermatology visits, used by health systems and insurers. First Derm — a fast store‑and‑forward photo review service by dermatologists; useful for quick triage and second opinions (good for initial reassurance or to prioritize in‑person care). SkinVision — app that uses CE‑marked AI to assess mole risk and directs users toward clinician review; useful as a screening tool but not definitive. DermTech — if you already have a suspicious mole and need noninvasive genomic testing, DermTech offers a tape‑test that can help decide need for biopsy (used in conjunction with clinician care). Practical recommendation For routine rashes or clearly benign lesions, a telederm visit on a reputable platform is reasonable and often effective. For any mole that looks irregular, is changing, or causes concern, arrange an in‑person dermatology visit (dermoscopy and biopsy capability) — telederm can be used for triage but should not replace definitive evaluation. If you want, I can tell you how to take ideal photos of a mole or rash step‑by‑step or help decide whether a specific lesion needs urgent in‑person evaluation based on a description (or photos if you’re comfortable sharing).

Mentioned in position 3 of 5

Read full answer with sources →
ClaudeJul 24, 2026, 09:39 UTC
Can an online dermatologist reliably diagnose a mole or rash from photos?

Online Dermatology for Moles and Rashes: Honest Assessment The short answer: partially, but with important limitations. What Works Reasonably Well Rashes are often diagnosable from good photos - conditions like eczema, psoriasis, ringworm, or contact dermatitis have recognizable visual patterns Clearly benign moles can often be reassured remotely Getting a preliminary opinion before deciding if you need urgent in-person care Reliable Services Worth Trying Teladoc Dermatology - large network, asynchronous photo review by board-certified dermatologists MDacne - good for acne specifically, AI-assisted with dermatologist oversight DermTech - uses actual genetic testing for mole analysis (more reliable than photos alone) First Derm - straightforward photo submission, fast turnaround Where Photos Fall Short Suspicious moles really need in-person evaluation or dermoscopy (a specialized magnifying tool) Texture, size changes over time, and subtle color gradients are hard to capture A photo can't replace the ABCDE exam done properly Bottom Line Recommendation Use online derm for rashes and minor skin concerns - it's genuinely useful. For any mole that worries you, use it as a first filter but follow up in person if there's any doubt. Don't let a reassuring photo review substitute for a real dermoscopy exam.

Mentioned in position 4 of 4

Read full answer with sources →
ChatGPTJul 21, 2026, 09:39 UTC
What are the best online dermatology services in 2026?

A quick note: my training data runs through June 2024, so I can’t guarantee company changes since then. However, the platforms below were the most reputable and widely used telederm services going into 2024 and remain good places to start in 2026. Also check recent reviews, state/region availability, and whether they accept your insurance before signing up. Top online dermatology services to consider (by common use case) Curology — Best for acne and personalized topical prescriptions Board-reviewed custom topical formulations (tretinoin, azelaic acid, clindamycin, etc.), regular follow-ups, subscription shipping. Strongly focused on acne and anti‑aging. Hims / Hers — Best for convenient, consumer-friendly care (acne, hair loss, anti‑aging) Large DTC brand with easy online intake, quick access to providers, and product + prescription delivery. Good for straightforward conditions and ongoing maintenance. First Derm — Best for fast photo-based advice / triage Anonymous, fast dermatology photo consults (often within a day). Good for deciding whether a lesion needs in-person follow-up. Not a substitute for biopsy when needed. DermatologistOnCall (and similar dedicated telederm clinics) — Best for comprehensive virtual visits Connects you with board-certified dermatologists for scheduled video visits and follow-up. Better for complex rashes, chronic conditions, and when you want continuity with a dermatologist rather than a prescriber-only service. Teladoc Health / Amwell / MDLIVE / Doctor On Demand — Best if you want a larger telehealth platform that includes dermatology Large telehealth companies with integrated dermatology services, often accept many insurers and have licensed dermatologists on demand. Good for convenience and insurance coverage. Dermatica (UK/Europe) — Best for customized, evidence-based topical regimens in Europe Subscription compounding service that creates tailored tretinoin/azelaic acid/antibiotic combinations; popular in the UK/Europe for acne/anti‑aging. (Availability depends on country.) SkinVision / Miiskin (and similar apps) — Best for monitoring moles and self‑tracking Apps that use AI to flag suspicious lesions and help you track changes over time. Good for monitoring but always follow up with a clinician for suspicious findings. DermTech / specialized molecular diagnostics — Best for advanced lesion testing Companies offering non‑invasive adhesive patch tests or molecular diagnostics for suspicious lesions (not a replacement for a dermatologist exam, but useful in specific workflows). How to choose the right service Condition type: acne/anti-aging → Curology, Hims/Hers, Dermatica; suspicious mole or growth → in‑person derm or First Derm for triage + urgent referral; chronic eczema/psoriasis → DermatologistOnCall or scheduled telederm visit. Prescription needs: confirm the service has licensed prescribers in your state/country and can ship Rx to your location. Speed vs continuity: photo-based apps are fastest; scheduled video visits offer continuity and more thorough evaluation. Insurance & cost: check whether the service accepts your insurance or is cash-pay. Large platforms often accept more plans. Privacy & regulation: verify HIPAA compliance (US) or local data protections (EU). For AI apps, check whether they’re CE‑marked/FDA‑cleared if they claim diagnostic ability. Red flags: any rapidly growing, bleeding, or changing lesion, unexplained persistent lump, or signs of infection should be seen in person promptly. If you tell me: your country (or state), and what skin issue you need help with (acne, mole, rash, hair loss, cosmetic) I can suggest the best one or two services to try and what to expect (cost, wait time, what to prepare for the visit).

Mentioned in position 3 of 12

Read full answer with sources →
ChatGPTJul 20, 2026, 09:38 UTC
Online dermatology vs an in person dermatologist: when is online enough?

Short answer Online dermatology is usually enough for common, limited, non-urgent problems (acne, mild eczema/rosacea, hair-loss consults, follow‑ups and prescription refills, many fungal rashes). You need an in‑person dermatologist when a physical exam/biopsy, immediate treatment, or urgent/higher‑risk evaluation is required (suspicious moles, rapidly changing lesions, widespread blistering or infection, severe psoriasis or eczema, unexplained bleeding or pain). When online dermatology is a good choice Mild to moderate acne, rosacea, seborrheic dermatitis, mild eczema: diagnosis and prescription topical/systemic therapy can usually be handled remotely. Follow‑ups and medication management (topical steroids, antibiotics, many oral medications). Initial hair‑loss evaluation (pattern hair loss vs. telogen effluvium) — may require in‑person workup later. Simple rashes and fungal infections — if photos are clear and symptoms are non‑severe. Quick triage: get a specialist opinion fast to decide whether you need an office visit. When you should see a dermatologist in person Any lesion that is new, growing, changing color/shape, crusting, bleeding, or painful — possible skin cancer needs dermoscopy and often a biopsy. Widespread, rapidly worsening, or blistering rashes; signs of systemic illness (fever, malaise) with skin findings. Suspected skin infections that are spreading quickly, have pus, or are very painful (may need drainage or IV antibiotics). Severe psoriasis or eczema not responding to treatment or requiring systemic/immunosuppressive therapy (which often needs labs and monitoring). Nail problems or scarring hair loss where biopsy or specialized imaging is required. Pediatric patients under certain ages or complicated medical histories — many doctors prefer in‑person evaluation. Red flags that require urgent in‑person care or ER Rapidly expanding painful red area, fever, or streaking (possible cellulitis). New bleeding or rapidly changing mole. Large blisters or skin peeling over a wide area. Severe allergic reactions with breathing difficulty or facial swelling. How to get the most from a telederm visit Take clear photos: good lighting, multiple angles, close‑ups and context shots, include a ruler or coin for scale. Send history: onset, symptoms (itch/pain), prior treatments and responses, medications, medical history. Ask whether they can prescribe the medicine you need and whether they can order labs or refer you for biopsy if needed. Know the provider’s limitations: many telederm services will refer you for an in‑person biopsy or urgent visit if they suspect cancer or need a procedure. Services and brands to consider (examples) Curology — focused on personalized topical prescription regimens for acne; convenient subscription model and follow‑ups. Apostrophe — telederm platform with board‑certified dermatologists for acne, eczema, hair loss and can prescribe medications. DermatologistOnCall / First Derm — offer board‑certified dermatologists for asynchronous consults and triage; useful if you want a quick specialist opinion. Teladoc (dermatology service through Teladoc or similar large telehealth platforms) — broad network and integrates with other telehealth needs. Hims & Hers — consumer-facing telederm options for acne and hair loss with straightforward access to common treatments. SkinVision / MoleScope (monitoring apps/tools) — useful for tracking moles between visits, but not a substitute for professional dermoscopy/biopsy. (Caveat: availability varies by country; check that the platform uses board‑certified dermatologists and that they can prescribe necessary medications or direct you to in‑person care when needed.) Bottom line Use online dermatology for convenience, triage, and management of common, non‑urgent skin problems. See a dermatologist in person when a physical exam, biopsy, urgent care, or complex systemic treatment and monitoring are likely to be needed. If you’re unsure, a telederm visit is often a good first step — just be ready to schedule an in‑person appointment if the clinician recommends it.

Mentioned in position 4 of 8

Read full answer with sources →
ChatGPTJul 19, 2026, 12:18 UTC
Can an online dermatologist reliably diagnose a mole or rash from photos?

Short answer: Yes — often. Teledermatology using clear photos can reliably diagnose many common rashes and benign skin problems, but it has important limits (especially for deciding whether a mole is melanoma). Use it as a fast, convenient triage tool — not always a substitute for an in‑person exam/biopsy when cancer is a concern. What helps accuracy Condition type: Inflammatory rashes (eczema, psoriasis, contact dermatitis, many infections) are diagnosed more reliably from photos than pigmented moles. Photo quality: good lighting, in focus, multiple angles, a close-up and a distance shot, and a size reference (coin/ruler) greatly improve accuracy. Dermatoscopic images (magnified, polarized photos) increase accuracy for pigmented lesions. Clinical history: age, duration, change, symptoms (itching, bleeding), prior biopsies, and treatments tried matter for a correct assessment. Provider credentials and ability to request follow‑up (in‑person visit, biopsy) improves safety. What research shows (summary) Studies and reviews generally find moderate-to-high agreement between teledermatology and face‑to‑face diagnoses for many conditions (often reported in roughly the 70–90% range), but performance drops for pigmented lesions when dermatoscopy is not available. That’s why suspicious moles often still need an in‑person exam and possible biopsy. When you should see a doctor in person (urgent) Any mole that fits ABCDEs (Asymmetry, Border irregularity, Color variegation, Diameter >6 mm or growing, Evolution/change). New, rapidly growing, painful, bleeding, or ulcerated lesions. Rashes with fever, widespread blistering, pus, or signs of systemic illness. When the teledermatologist recommends an in‑person evaluation or biopsy. How to get the most reliable telederm consult Provide multiple, well-lit, in-focus photos: full area, close-up, side view, and include a ruler/coin for scale. Provide clear history (onset, change, symptoms, prior treatments, medical history, medications). If possible, use a service that lets the dermatologist request follow-up or arrange face‑to‑face care. Services you can consider (examples) Teladoc or Amwell — large telehealth platforms that include board‑certified dermatologists and are often covered by insurers; good if you want continuity with telemedicine and claims through insurance. DermatologistOnCall — a telederm service focused on skin problems; connects to dermatologists for diagnosis and treatment plans. First Derm — app-based, fast consults with dermatologists for quick, anonymous second opinions (good for reassurance or triage, but limited for high‑risk lesions). SkinIO and MoleScope — tools/companies that support high‑quality dermatoscopic imaging and mole mapping (useful if you need serial monitoring of multiple moles or want higher diagnostic quality photos). Privacy & cost notes Coverage varies: some insurances and Medicare cover telederm visits; direct‑to‑consumer services often charge per consult. Check credentials, privacy policy, and whether you’ll be referred for in‑person follow-up if needed. Bottom line Teledermatology is a useful, often reliable first step for rashes and many non‑suspicious skin lesions. For any mole that looks unusual, is changing, or is concerning, insist on an in‑person dermatology visit and biopsy when recommended. If you want, tell me about the lesion and I can give specific tips on what photos to take and whether telederm or urgent in‑person care is more appropriate.

Mentioned in position 4 of 6

Read full answer with sources →

TL;DR

First Derm is an online dermatology platform that lets patients submit photos of skin concerns and receive assessments from board-certified dermatologists without an in-person visit. According to WellRank's latest index, it ranks tenth in the Online Dermatology category with 12% AI visibility and thirty-fifth in Hair Loss Treatment with 2% visibility, placing it among a competitive set that includes Curology, Teladoc, and Apostrophe in AI-generated answers.

Company Overview

First Derm operates as an asynchronous teledermatology service, meaning patients upload images and written descriptions of skin issues and receive a response from a dermatologist within a defined turnaround window rather than through a live video call. The company's business model is built around pay-per-case consultations rather than subscription enrollment, which lowers the barrier for one-off skin questions. Its HQ location and founding year are not widely confirmed in public sources.

Product Features

  • Asynchronous photo-based skin consultations reviewed by licensed dermatologists
  • Coverage of a broad range of skin conditions including rashes, acne, moles, and infections
  • Fast turnaround responses, typically within hours of submission
  • AI-assisted skin condition screening to help triage and guide users before dermatologist review
  • Anonymous case submission option to protect patient privacy
  • Referral guidance when an in-person visit or prescription is needed

Target Market

First Derm primarily serves individuals who need a fast, accessible dermatology opinion without scheduling a clinic appointment, including people in regions with limited access to dermatologists. It covers a wide range of skin conditions and appears to operate internationally, though specific market geographies are not publicly detailed at a granular level.

Buyer Personas

  • A working adult with a new or changing skin lesion who wants a quick expert opinion before deciding whether to see a doctor in person.
  • A traveler or expatriate who lacks easy access to a local dermatologist and needs a reliable remote assessment.
  • A parent concerned about an unusual rash or skin condition on their child and looking for guidance without an emergency room visit.
  • A privacy-conscious individual who prefers an anonymous or low-friction channel for discussing a sensitive skin concern.

Funding & Performance

Funding stage and total capital raised are not publicly disclosed. First Derm does not appear to be publicly traded, and no widely verified funding rounds have been reported in mainstream technology or healthcare media.

Recent Developments

First Derm has been noted for integrating AI-powered skin analysis tools alongside its human dermatologist review workflow, reflecting a broader industry trend toward hybrid AI and clinician models in teledermatology. The company has also expanded awareness efforts around skin cancer screening and mole monitoring as public interest in preventive dermatology has grown. Specific launch dates or product release timelines are not confirmed in widely available sources.

Competitive Landscape

Based on WellRank co-mention data, First Derm appears most frequently in AI answers alongside Curology, Teladoc, Amwell, Apostrophe, DermatologistOnCall, MDLive, Hims and Hers, and SkinVision. Within this set, First Derm differentiates itself through its asynchronous, photo-based model and pay-per-case pricing rather than the subscription-first approach common among competitors like Curology and Apostrophe. Its 12% AI visibility in Online Dermatology reflects a solid but not dominant position in a category where larger telehealth platforms carry significant brand weight.

First Derm vs the brands AI recommends alongside it

The real competitive set in Online dermatology: brands the engines name in the same answers, ranked on the latest day.

BrandRankAI visibility
First Derm logo
First DermThis brand
#23
6.7%
Curology logo
Curology

38 shared answers

#1
70.0%
Teladoc logo
Teladoc

35 shared answers

#4
18.3%
Amwell logo
Amwell

32 shared answers

#8
11.7%
Apostrophe logo
Apostrophe

30 shared answers

#2
60.0%

Email me when overtakes First Derm

One email the day the ranks flip. Nothing else.

User Sentiment

WellRank's corpus of 41 AI mentions shows a strongly positive skew, with 36 positive mentions, 5 neutral mentions, and zero mixed or cautious mentions, suggesting that AI engines consistently frame First Derm as a credible and useful service rather than flagging concerns. Public user sentiment echoes this pattern, with reviewers frequently citing the convenience and speed of the asynchronous model as standout attributes. No prominent negative narratives appear in widely circulated coverage.

Pricing

First Derm operates on a pay-per-consultation model rather than a monthly subscription, which is publicly noted as a point of differentiation. Exact case prices are not consistently published and may vary by service level or geography, so precise figures are not confirmed here.

Sources cited around First Derm

The sites engines cite in answers mentioning this brand. Win these, win the answer.

Track First Derm weekly

One email a week: rank moves, new competitors, and the answers that changed. No noise.

Work at First Derm? Get your AI Visibility Audit.

See every buyer intent question your customers ask AI, which ones you are losing, who wins them instead, and the exact sources driving those answers. You will finally understand your buyer intent and what Propel would do to win it.