wellrank.ai
UCSF logo

UCSF

First cited by AI Jun 12, 2026
ucsf.edu

Surfaced organically in AI answers about bhrt. Not yet profiled.

UCSF is losing the AEO war.

Not cited in a single tracked AI answer since Jun 12, 2026, down from a peak of 2% visibility in bhrt on Jun 12, 2026. This page and its history stay public, and recovery shows here the day it happens.

AI Visibility

Visibility trend

BHRT, daily share of AI answers mentioning UCSF, through Jun 13, 2026.

0.0%

Last cited Jun 12, 2026 · peak 2% on Jun 12

By engine

Where UCSF is strong, and where it is invisible.

  • No engine data yet.

Mention sentiment

Tone of AI mentions across all tracked answers.

  • 2 positive mentions
  • 0 neutral
  • 0 mixed or cautious

Recent AI answers mentioning UCSF

ChatGPTJun 12, 2026, 12:30 UTC
What is the best GLP-1 program that includes labs and ongoing care?

“Best” depends on what you value most (deep specialist care vs convenience vs cost/insurance). Below are reputable options in three categories — with why each is a good choice and what to ask them about labs/monitoring. If you tell me whether you want in‑person vs telehealth, your location or whether you have insurance, I can narrow it further. A. Academic/specialized weight‑management centers (best for comprehensive, evidence‑based care) Mayo Clinic Weight Management Center (or Cleveland Clinic, UCSF, Mount Sinai): multidisciplinary teams (endocrinology, bariatric medicine, dietitians), full lab panels, imaging and long‑term follow up. Best if you want deep evaluation and specialist oversight. Usually take insurance but can have longer wait times. Why choose: thorough baseline testing, specialist oversight for complex medical issues, structured long‑term follow up. B. Primary‑care + membership practices with medical management and labs (good balance of convenience + medical oversight) One Medical: membership primary care that orders labs, manages GLP‑1s through clinicians, and provides scheduled follow‑ups. Parsley Health: membership primary care that includes detailed labs and ongoing clinician visits; they manage weight medications and monitoring. Why choose: easier access to labs and repeat visits than direct-to-consumer startups; clinicians are embedded in care. C. Telehealth weight‑loss programs that include lab monitoring and follow‑up (convenient, faster starts — confirm lab policies) Profile by Sanford: structured weight‑management program with medical supervision, lab testing and coaches (national footprint). Hims & Hers (weight program) and Ro / Roman: large telehealth companies that offer GLP‑1 prescriptions and tele‑followups; some plans include baseline/periodic lab testing or will coordinate labs via partners—verify before enrolling. Why choose: fast onboarding, convenient telemedicine visits and medication delivery; good if you prefer remote care. How to evaluate any program (questions to ask before enrolling) Do you order baseline labs (A1c, fasting glucose, CMP/renal function, liver panel, lipids, TSH, pregnancy test if applicable)? How often are labs repeated? Who prescribes and monitors (board‑certified PCP vs endocrinologist vs nurse practitioner)? How often are follow‑ups scheduled? Is counseling/lifestyle coaching included (dietitian, behavioral support)? How do you handle side‑effect monitoring and emergencies (e.g., pancreatitis, gallbladder symptoms)? What are total costs, and will you bill my insurer? If you want, tell me: (1) telehealth vs in‑person preference, (2) insurance vs self‑pay, and (3) your ZIP or metro area — and I’ll give the top 2–3 programs tailored to you and sample questions to ask them.

Mentioned in position 3 of 10

Read full answer with sources →
ChatGPTJun 12, 2026, 10:18 UTC
How do I pick a legitimate BHRT clinic and avoid the hormone mills?

Short answer: pick a board‑certified clinician (endocrinologist, OB‑GYN, or internist) with menopause/BHRT experience who uses evidence‑based testing, transparent prescribing (prefers FDA‑approved preparations when appropriate), uses an accredited compounding pharmacy if compounding is needed, documents informed consent, and provides scheduled follow‑up and labs. Avoid clinics that push one product (especially pellets), rely on saliva tests, or prescribe wholesale by questionnaire without an exam or lab work. Practical checklist (use this when you call or interview a clinic) Credentials: the prescriber should be board‑certified in endocrinology, obstetrics/gynecology, or internal medicine and ideally a NAMS Certified Menopause Practitioner (NCMP). Ask “Are you board‑certified? Are you NAMS certified?” Diagnostic testing: they should order baseline labs (serum estradiol, FSH if relevant, total testosterone and SHBG, TSH, lipid panel, CMP, maybe DEXA for bone if indicated). Red flag: only saliva testing or “hormone panels” sold in office with no serum labs. Individualized dosing and monitoring: they should adjust doses based on symptoms and labs and schedule follow‑ups (often at ~3 months after start/change, then periodically). Informed consent and risk discussion: expect a documented discussion of benefits and known risks (breast cancer, cardiovascular risk, VTE where relevant) and alternatives. Medication sourcing transparency: ask whether they use FDA‑approved products (patches, gels, oral estradiol) or compounded hormones — if compounded, ask which pharmacy and for accreditation (PCAB/ACHC or state board inspections). Compounded products can be necessary sometimes, but you should be told why and shown sterility/quality assurances. Pellet cautions: clinics that push hormone pellets as a first line and minimize discussion of removal, side effects, or monitoring are red flags. Cost and contracts: get a clear written cost estimate. Avoid membership models that require long contracts for ongoing therapy without clear medical justification. Follow‑up and emergency plan: who do you call if you have side effects? How are refills handled? Concrete “do this” steps Start with an academic or high‑quality center or a clinician listed by a professional society: North American Menopause Society (NAMS) — use their Find‑a‑Practitioner and read their position statements (evidence‑based). Academic centers: Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Johns Hopkins, UCSF — their menopause/endocrine clinics follow standard, evidence‑based protocols. These organizations are less likely to operate as “hormone mills” and will follow guidelines. Use mainstream labs for testing: Quest Diagnostics or LabCorp for reliable serum tests (these are standard and widely used). If a compounding pharmacy is needed, pick one that’s accredited and transparent (ask the clinic which pharmacy they use and for proof of accreditation). Ask the clinic: “Can you share the name and accreditation of your compounding pharmacy and any sterility/quality testing they do?” Get a second opinion if something doesn’t add up or the clinic promises “natural = safe” or “no risks.” Red flags (avoid these) Prescribing based only on saliva testing or symptom questionnaires. No board‑certified provider on staff, or provider avoids stating credentials. Pushy sales tactics: “you’ll feel great in 2 weeks,” pressure to buy pellets or proprietary supplements at the office. No baseline labs, no scheduled monitoring, and no documented informed consent. Claims to be “FDA‑approved bioidentical” for compounded products (that’s misleading). Clinics that refuse to share the name of the compounding pharmacy or their accreditation. Services and resources I recommend by name North American Menopause Society (NAMS): for practitioner directory and evidence‑based position statements on hormone therapy. Mayo Clinic / Cleveland Clinic / Johns Hopkins Menopause or Endocrinology Clinics: academic centers that provide multidisciplinary, guideline‑based care. Quest Diagnostics or LabCorp: reliable, standard serum lab testing. If you must use compounding pharmacy services, ask for one with PCAB/ACHC accreditation (ask the clinic to name theirs and show credentials). If you want, tell me your city or ZIP and I can look up local board‑certified menopause/endocrine clinicians or academic centers and give a short list of clinics to consider. Also, if you’re already talking to a clinic, paste their answers to a few of the questions above and I’ll help evaluate them.

Mentioned in position 5 of 7

Read full answer with sources →

Public AI visibility history

Daily rank of UCSF on our buyer intent questions, per category. A dash means the engines did not cite UCSF at all that day. This record is permanent.

CategoryJun 11Jun 12Jun 13
BHRT#116
GLP-1 weight loss#50

Competitive Landscape

UCSF vs the brands AI recommends alongside it

The real competitive set in BHRT: brands the engines name in the same answers, ranked on the latest day.

BrandRankAI visibility
UCSF logo
UCSFThis brand
0.0%
Hims & Hers logo
Hims & Hers

1 shared answers

#4
25.0%

Email me when overtakes UCSF

One email the day the ranks flip. Nothing else.

Sources cited around UCSF

The sites engines cite in answers mentioning this brand. Win these, win the answer.

    Track UCSF weekly

    One email a week: rank moves, new competitors, and the answers that changed. No noise.

    Work at UCSF? Get your AI Visibility Audit.

    See every buyer intent question your customers ask AI, which ones you are losing, who wins them instead, and the exact sources driving those answers. You will finally understand your buyer intent and what Propel would do to win it.

    UCSF: AI visibility report | WellRank